Surveyors guide to Becoming well adjusted
Teaching a class the other day, yesterday in fact, my students and I stumbled upon a topic that doesn’t seem to have much coverage. Today I’m hoping to shed some additional light on this topic to help out all Surveyors who are new to Civil 3D and would like to be able to add an adjustment into their project database.
Previously, this thought was much like the dream for Rome in Gladiator. If you made a sound any more than a whisper it would vanish, thus making life miserable as can be seen by the article written here about Civil 3D and the drawing transformation settings.
The magic button that needs to be pressed is the Scale Factor, listed under Survey Database settings. However, this isn’t where the story ends. The questions remained “What scale factor is it using, and where do you set it?”
As thought in previous releases, perhaps it’s the transformation scale that is set in the drawing settings on the Settings tab of Toolspace. Alas, setting that does more harm than good, again see previously referenced article. What was needed was a consistent, reliable and safe method of applying a scale factor.
During a recently held Cadapult Survey event, I had the change to ask Josh Kehs from Autodesk a few questions about RAW data conversion and commented lines in a FBK file. As I have previously been asked many times how to perform coordinate adjustment when it’s set in the RAW file.
As may or may not be known the conversion process from a RAW survey file, whether it be .RAW, .RW5, .JOB, SDR etc. into FBK, removes all of the critical information relating to data transformations (Elevation adjustment and Scale Factors). When asked about why this is done the way it is, the answer was simple, direct and most importantly it made sense. This information is commented/stripped out of the FBK file to prevent any accidental double/triple corrections from happening to the data.
While that’s great for preventing accidental duplication of adjustments, it doesn’t help when an adjustment is actually required. So to proceed with adding a scale factor to a survey database there are a few things that need to be setup.
How are your feet?
As in most things Civil 3D related the devil is in the details. While this next bit should be a no-brainer, it still catches people out when using the survey module.
Foot/USF/International Foot … it all seems so straightforward on digital paper, however in the real world it gets fuzzy. Case and point: During the survey class yesterday I had the customers RAW file which we converted into a FBK, and then added it as an import event through the Survey module. However, things didn’t come out quite right. Having been shot in assumed coordinates, the know XY of point 501 should have been 10000,10000. When the points were imported into the drawing point 501 was NOT at the above mentioned coordinates, instead it was at 9999.98,9999.98. The obvious answer here is the conversion from the different units of Foot measure (International and US). Upon further inspection into the data we noticed that in the RAW data the UNITS were indeed “FOOT”. The comment was made “All looks good here!” However, that isn’t exactly the case. In this instance while yes the RAW file didn’t say International Foot, it also didn’t say the correct term for Us Foot which is “USF”. This seemingly innocent oversight would have caused numerous issues down the road. After clarifying this verbiage to them, it was then obvious what went wrong. (Whether this is instrument specific has yet to be determined.)
With the RAW file updated to USF for the UNITS, we reprocessed the FBK file and reimported it into the existing database. Much to our delight the points came in on the correct coordinates as they should have in the first place.
In the trenches – Getting things right in the field …book
The next step in getting the scale factor to apply properly to the survey database is to actually add it into the FBK file.
Now before I get any comments on how the actual FBK should never be modified, we aren’t really changing it per say, just adding some information back in using the correct format.
Note in the FBK file header that there is a SF call. This is where the scale factor that the survey database check box is looking for resides, and is the only place I’ve found to apply this factor correctly. To further illustrate the “point”: Below is a line drawn between points 500 and 501 and dimensioned before and after applying the scale factor. Ok so technically it’s 2 different lines, but they connect the same points. The upper dimension before the Scale Factor Adjustment and the bottom dimension is after the Scale Factor Adjustment which in this case was .9999057.
Hopefully this write-up clarifies how to properly use and apply a scale correction factor to a survey database using Civil 3D. (In this instance 2013, however this option both exists and works in 2012.)
Print
Facebook
Twitter
Google Bookmarks